Image Compressor Zimbabwe
formats

JPG vs PNG vs WebP — which one should you use?

05 October 2026 · 2 min read

JPG vs PNG vs WebP — which one should you use?

Three formats dominate the web. Picking the wrong one can mean a 10× larger file — or a visibly broken image. Here's the short version.

JPEG (.jpg)

Use for: photographs, complex gradients, anything with millions of colours.

JPEG is lossy — it throws away data that human eyes are unlikely to notice. At quality 75-85 it's nearly invisible for photos, and the file shrinks dramatically.

Don't use for: logos, screenshots, text, anything with sharp edges. JPEG smears edges into blocks.

PNG (.png)

Use for: logos, icons, screenshots, images that need transparency.

PNG is lossless — the pixels you save are the pixels you get back. That makes it perfect for line art and UI graphics but terrible for photos. A 4 MB photo saved as PNG can balloon to 20 MB.

WebP (.webp)

Use for: almost everything, honestly.

WebP was released by Google in 2010 and has been supported in every major browser since 2020. It offers:

  • Lossy mode that beats JPEG by 25-35% at the same visual quality
  • Lossless mode that beats PNG by 20-30%
  • Full transparency support
  • Animation (replaces GIF)

The only reason not to use WebP is if you need to support a very old browser — and at this point, that's essentially nobody.

The decision tree

  1. Photo? → WebP, fall back to JPEG if the WebP encoder isn't available
  2. Logo or icon with transparency? → WebP, fall back to PNG
  3. Screenshot with text? → WebP lossless, fall back to PNG
  4. Animated? → WebP, fall back to MP4

Try it yourself

Our compressor converts any JPG or PNG to WebP with one toggle. On a typical photo you'll see 30-50% smaller output with no visible difference.

Toggle WebP on in the settings panel and compare a few of your own photos. The savings add up fast on a website with hundreds of images.